AI for Enterprise Security
Audit Your SOC the Way You Audit Everyone Else.
Your analysts hold the most privileged access in the building. Crogl reviews the quality of their investigations and their access patterns continuously, without turning review into surveillance.
Crogl handles the investigation. The analyst makes the call.
The Oversight Gap
Your SOC reviews everyone's access except its own.
Auditors expect proof that privileged users are under ongoing oversight, and the security team is the most privileged group there is. The evidence sits in three systems. Correlating it by hand is slow, so QA spot checks get dropped the week the queue spikes, which is the week they matter most.
AU-6
The NIST SP 800-53 control for ongoing audit review, analysis, and reporting
CMMC 2.0
Asks you to demonstrate oversight of privileged users, not assert it
3
Systems the evidence lives in: ticketing, SIEM login logs, and badge data
The Crogl Approach
Every investigation reviewed. Every flag confirmed in the data.
Ticket Quality Scored
Crogl scores each closed ticket on comment substance, resolution time, and SOP-step completion, against the same standard for every analyst.
Access Patterns Checked
Login history is compared with each analyst's own pattern. Off-hours or unusual access gets flagged for a closer look.
Confirmed Before It's a Finding
A flag becomes a finding only after Crogl confirms the pattern in live data. Thresholds are conservative, so speed alone does not flag an analyst.
What Crogl Delivers
Continuous Investigation QA
Every closed ticket reviewed, not a monthly sample. Skipped SOP steps surface the week they happen.
Access Oversight for the Most Privileged Team
Login anomalies across the SOC, correlated with the tickets each analyst worked.
Review Without Surveillance
Crogl reads work product and access logs the SOC already generates. No keystroke logging. No session capture.
Every Review Shows Its Coverage
Each review names the sources it checked, so the auditor sees exactly what was reviewed and nothing is assumed covered.
Works With
“Every analyst. Every ticket. The same standard.”
Frequently asked questions
Is Crogl's SOC review employee monitoring?
No. Crogl reviews the work product and access logs your SOC already generates: closed tickets, SOP-step completion, and login history. There is no keystroke logging and no session capture. Thresholds are conservative, so speed alone does not flag an analyst, and a flag becomes a finding only after Crogl confirms the pattern in live data.
What does an auditor get from a Crogl SOC review?
A documented review of every closed ticket and every flagged login, held to the same standard for every analyst. Each finding carries the evidence behind it, and each review names the sources it checked. That record supports demonstrating ongoing oversight of privileged users, as NIST SP 800-53 AU-6 and CMMC 2.0 ask for.
Related Reading
Hold the SOC to Its Own Standard
When did someone last review how your own team closed its tickets?
We'll show you how Crogl reviews investigation quality and access for your SOC, using the ticket and login data you already have.
Deployed in air-gapped federal environments, critical infrastructure, and Fortune 500 financial institutions.